website developers Sydney

website developers Sydney

wealth

Title: The Role of Website Developers in Sydney

Website developers are the architects of the digital world; they shape our online experiences by creating websites that are functional, accessible, and visually appealing. In Sydney, a city renowned for its innovative spirit and technological prowess, website developers play an integral role in shaping the city's thriving digital landscape.

Website development is more than just coding or graphic design. It's a multi-faceted discipline that combines various elements like programming, user interface design, content management and search engine optimisation to create comprehensive web solutions. In Sydney, a city known for its vibrant business scene and high internet penetration rate, quality website development services are highly sought after.

Sydney-based website developers often cater to a diverse clientele ranging from small businesses looking to establish their online presence to multinational corporations seeking sophisticated web solutions.

Website developers Sydney - wealth

  1. lens
  2. laptop
  3. Sales Funnel
They offer an array of services including designing responsive websites that adapt smoothly across different devices and browsers, developing e-commerce platforms with secure payment gateways, integrating SEO strategies for improved visibility on search engines among many others.

One of the reasons why Sydney is such a hotbed for top-notch website developers lies in its educational infrastructure. Institutions like University of Technology Sydney (UTS) and University of New South Wales (UNSW) offer advanced programs in computer science and related fields which produce skilled graduates annually who join the workforce as proficient website developers.

Moreover, Sydney's thriving tech community provides ample opportunities for networking and professional growth. Regular tech meetups, hackathons and conferences held across the city allow these professionals to stay updated with latest industry trends while also fostering collaboration amongst peers.

Another factor contributing to the prominence of website developers in Sydney is the strong support from local government towards fostering digital innovation. From implementing smart city initiatives to promoting digital literacy programs within communities - there's a clear recognition about importance of technology which positively impacts demand for web development services.

Sydney's diverse economy also plays into this trend. With sectors such as finance, retail, tourism and education heavily reliant on their online platforms to engage customers and drive business growth, the skills of website developers becomes indispensable.

Website developers Sydney - lead generation

  1. understanding
  2. real property
  3. marketing
They not only create websites that are user-friendly but also incorporate innovative features to provide a unique digital experience for users.

In conclusion, website developers in Sydney play an integral part in shaping the city's digital landscape. Their work impacts every sector of the economy and contributes significantly towards making Sydney a truly modern and connected city. As technology continues to evolve at an unprecedented pace, the role of these professionals will only become more significant, ensuring that Sydney remains at the forefront of digital innovation.

Website developers Sydney - navigation

  1. wealth
  2. lead generation
  3. navigation

Web Design Agency



 

Google Search
Google Search on desktop
Type of site
Web search engine
Available in 149 languages
Owner Google
Revenue Google Ads
URL google.com Edit this at Wikidata
IPv6 support Yes[1]
Commercial Yes
Registration Optional
Launched
  • 1995; 30 years ago (1995) (first prototype)
  • 1997; 28 years ago (1997) (final launch)
Current status Online
Written in

Google Search (also known simply as Google or Google.com) is a search engine operated by Google. It allows users to search for information on the Web by entering keywords or phrases. Google Search uses algorithms to analyze and rank websites based on their relevance to the search query. It is the most popular search engine worldwide.

Google Search is the most-visited website in the world. As of 2020, Google Search has a 92% share of the global search engine market.[3] Approximately 26.75% of Google's monthly global traffic comes from the United States, 4.44% from India, 4.4% from Brazil, 3.92% from the United Kingdom and 3.84% from Japan according to data provided by Similarweb.[4]

The order of search results returned by Google is based, in part, on a priority rank system called "PageRank". Google Search also provides many different options for customized searches, using symbols to include, exclude, specify or require certain search behavior, and offers specialized interactive experiences, such as flight status and package tracking, weather forecasts, currency, unit, and time conversions, word definitions, and more.

The main purpose of Google Search is to search for text in publicly accessible documents offered by web servers, as opposed to other data, such as images or data contained in databases. It was originally developed in 1996 by Larry Page, Sergey Brin, and Scott Hassan.[5][6][7] The search engine would also be set up in the garage of Susan Wojcicki's Menlo Park home.[8] In 2011, Google introduced "Google Voice Search" to search for spoken, rather than typed, words.[9] In 2012, Google introduced a semantic search feature named Knowledge Graph.

Analysis of the frequency of search terms may indicate economic, social and health trends.[10] Data about the frequency of use of search terms on Google can be openly inquired via Google Trends and have been shown to correlate with flu outbreaks and unemployment levels, and provide the information faster than traditional reporting methods and surveys. As of mid-2016, Google's search engine has begun to rely on deep neural networks.[11]

In August 2024, a US judge in Virginia ruled that Google's search engine held an illegal monopoly over Internet search.[12][13] The court found that Google maintained its market dominance by paying large amounts to phone-makers and browser-developers to make Google its default search engine.[14]

Search indexing

[edit]

Google indexes hundreds of terabytes of information from web pages.[15] For websites that are currently down or otherwise not available, Google provides links to cached versions of the site, formed by the search engine's latest indexing of that page.[16] Additionally, Google indexes some file types, being able to show users PDFs, Word documents, Excel spreadsheets, PowerPoint presentations, certain Flash multimedia content, and plain text files.[17] Users can also activate "SafeSearch", a filtering technology aimed at preventing explicit and pornographic content from appearing in search results.[18]

Despite Google search's immense index, sources generally assume that Google is only indexing less than 5% of the total Internet, with the rest belonging to the deep web, inaccessible through its search tools.[15][19][20]

In 2012, Google changed its search indexing tools to demote sites that had been accused of piracy.[21] In October 2016, Gary Illyes, a webmaster trends analyst with Google, announced that the search engine would be making a separate, primary web index dedicated for mobile devices, with a secondary, less up-to-date index for desktop use. The change was a response to the continued growth in mobile usage, and a push for web developers to adopt a mobile-friendly version of their websites.[22][23] In December 2017, Google began rolling out the change, having already done so for multiple websites.[24]

"Caffeine" search architecture upgrade

[edit]

In August 2009, Google invited web developers to test a new search architecture, codenamed "Caffeine", and give their feedback. The new architecture provided no visual differences in the user interface, but added significant speed improvements and a new "under-the-hood" indexing infrastructure. The move was interpreted in some quarters as a response to Microsoft's recent release of an upgraded version of its own search service, renamed Bing, as well as the launch of Wolfram Alpha, a new search engine based on "computational knowledge".[25][26] Google announced completion of "Caffeine" on June 8, 2010, claiming 50% fresher results due to continuous updating of its index.[27]

With "Caffeine", Google moved its back-end indexing system away from MapReduce and onto Bigtable, the company's distributed database platform.[28][29]

"Medic" search algorithm update

[edit]

In August 2018, Danny Sullivan from Google announced a broad core algorithm update. As per current analysis done by the industry leaders Search Engine Watch and Search Engine Land, the update was to drop down the medical and health-related websites that were not user friendly and were not providing good user experience. This is why the industry experts named it "Medic".[30]

Google reserves very high standards for YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) pages. This is because misinformation can affect users financially, physically, or emotionally. Therefore, the update targeted particularly those YMYL pages that have low-quality content and misinformation. This resulted in the algorithm targeting health and medical-related websites more than others. However, many other websites from other industries were also negatively affected.[31]

Search results

[edit]

Ranking of results

[edit]

By 2012, it handled more than 3.5 billion searches per day.[32] In 2013 the European Commission found that Google Search favored Google's own products, instead of the best result for consumers' needs.[33] In February 2015 Google announced a major change to its mobile search algorithm which would favor mobile friendly over other websites. Nearly 60% of Google searches come from mobile phones. Google says it wants users to have access to premium quality websites. Those websites which lack a mobile-friendly interface would be ranked lower and it is expected that this update will cause a shake-up of ranks. Businesses who fail to update their websites accordingly could see a dip in their regular websites traffic.[34]

PageRank

[edit]

Google's rise was largely due to a patented algorithm called PageRank which helps rank web pages that match a given search string.[35] When Google was a Stanford research project, it was nicknamed BackRub because the technology checks backlinks to determine a site's importance. Other keyword-based methods to rank search results, used by many search engines that were once more popular than Google, would check how often the search terms occurred in a page, or how strongly associated the search terms were within each resulting page. The PageRank algorithm instead analyzes human-generated links assuming that web pages linked from many important pages are also important. The algorithm computes a recursive score for pages, based on the weighted sum of other pages linking to them. PageRank is thought to correlate well with human concepts of importance. In addition to PageRank, Google, over the years, has added many other secret criteria for determining the ranking of resulting pages. This is reported to comprise over 250 different indicators,[36][37] the specifics of which are kept secret to avoid difficulties created by scammers and help Google maintain an edge over its competitors globally.

PageRank was influenced by a similar page-ranking and site-scoring algorithm earlier used for RankDex, developed by Robin Li in 1996. Larry Page's patent for PageRank filed in 1998 includes a citation to Li's earlier patent. Li later went on to create the Chinese search engine Baidu in 2000.[38][39]

In a potential hint of Google's future direction of their Search algorithm, Google's then chief executive Eric Schmidt, said in a 2007 interview with the Financial Times: "The goal is to enable Google users to be able to ask the question such as 'What shall I do tomorrow?' and 'What job shall I take?'".[40] Schmidt reaffirmed this during a 2010 interview with The Wall Street Journal: "I actually think most people don't want Google to answer their questions, they want Google to tell them what they should be doing next."[41]

Google optimization

[edit]

Because Google is the most popular search engine, many webmasters attempt to influence their website's Google rankings. An industry of consultants has arisen to help websites increase their rankings on Google and other search engines. This field, called search engine optimization, attempts to discern patterns in search engine listings, and then develop a methodology for improving rankings to draw more searchers to their clients' sites. Search engine optimization encompasses both "on page" factors (like body copy, title elements, H1 heading elements and image alt attribute values) and Off Page Optimization factors (like anchor text and PageRank). The general idea is to affect Google's relevance algorithm by incorporating the keywords being targeted in various places "on page", in particular the title element and the body copy (note: the higher up in the page, presumably the better its keyword prominence and thus the ranking). Too many occurrences of the keyword, however, cause the page to look suspect to Google's spam checking algorithms. Google has published guidelines for website owners who would like to raise their rankings when using legitimate optimization consultants.[42] It has been hypothesized, and, allegedly, is the opinion of the owner of one business about which there have been numerous complaints, that negative publicity, for example, numerous consumer complaints, may serve as well to elevate page rank on Google Search as favorable comments.[43] The particular problem addressed in The New York Times article, which involved DecorMyEyes, was addressed shortly thereafter by an undisclosed fix in the Google algorithm. According to Google, it was not the frequently published consumer complaints about DecorMyEyes which resulted in the high ranking but mentions on news websites of events which affected the firm such as legal actions against it. Google Search Console helps to check for websites that use duplicate or copyright content.[44]

"Hummingbird" search algorithm upgrade

[edit]

In 2013, Google significantly upgraded its search algorithm with "Hummingbird". Its name was derived from the speed and accuracy of the hummingbird.[45] The change was announced on September 26, 2013, having already been in use for a month.[46] "Hummingbird" places greater emphasis on natural language queries, considering context and meaning over individual keywords.[45] It also looks deeper at content on individual pages of a website, with improved ability to lead users directly to the most appropriate page rather than just a website's homepage.[47] The upgrade marked the most significant change to Google search in years, with more "human" search interactions[48] and a much heavier focus on conversation and meaning.[45] Thus, web developers and writers were encouraged to optimize their sites with natural writing rather than forced keywords, and make effective use of technical web development for on-site navigation.[49]

Search results quality

[edit]

In 2023, drawing on internal Google documents disclosed as part of the United States v. Google LLC (2020) antitrust case, technology reporters claimed that Google Search was "bloated and overmonetized"[50] and that the "semantic matching" of search queries put advertising profits before quality.[51] Wired withdrew Megan Gray's piece after Google complained about alleged inaccuracies, while the author reiterated that «As stated in court, "A goal of Project Mercury was to increase commercial queries"».[52]

In March 2024, Google announced a significant update to its core search algorithm and spam targeting, which is expected to wipe out 40 percent of all spam results.[53] On March 20th, it was confirmed that the roll out of the spam update was complete.[54]

[edit]

On September 10, 2024, the European-based EU Court of Justice found that Google held an illegal monopoly with the way the company showed favoritism to its shopping search, and could not avoid paying €2.4 billion.[55] The EU Court of Justice referred to Google's treatment of rival shopping searches as "discriminatory" and in violation of the Digital Markets Act.[55]

Interface

[edit]

Page layout

[edit]

At the top of the search page, the approximate result count and the response time two digits behind decimal is noted. Of search results, page titles and URLs, dates, and a preview text snippet for each result appears. Along with web search results, sections with images, news, and videos may appear.[56] The length of the previewed text snipped was experimented with in 2015 and 2017.[57][58]

[edit]

"Universal search" was launched by Google on May 16, 2007, as an idea that merged the results from different kinds of search types into one. Prior to Universal search, a standard Google search would consist of links only to websites. Universal search, however, incorporates a wide variety of sources, including websites, news, pictures, maps, blogs, videos, and more, all shown on the same search results page.[59][60] Marissa Mayer, then-vice president of search products and user experience, described the goal of Universal search as "we're attempting to break down the walls that traditionally separated our various search properties and integrate the vast amounts of information available into one simple set of search results.[61]

In June 2017, Google expanded its search results to cover available job listings. The data is aggregated from various major job boards and collected by analyzing company homepages. Initially only available in English, the feature aims to simplify finding jobs suitable for each user.[62][63]

Rich snippets

[edit]

In May 2009, Google announced that they would be parsing website microformats to populate search result pages with "Rich snippets". Such snippets include additional details about results, such as displaying reviews for restaurants and social media accounts for individuals.[64]

In May 2016, Google expanded on the "Rich snippets" format to offer "Rich cards", which, similarly to snippets, display more information about results, but shows them at the top of the mobile website in a swipeable carousel-like format.[65] Originally limited to movie and recipe websites in the United States only, the feature expanded to all countries globally in 2017.[66]

Knowledge Graph

[edit]

The Knowledge Graph is a knowledge base used by Google to enhance its search engine's results with information gathered from a variety of sources.[67] This information is presented to users in a box to the right of search results.[68] Knowledge Graph boxes were added to Google's search engine in May 2012,[67] starting in the United States, with international expansion by the end of the year.[69] The information covered by the Knowledge Graph grew significantly after launch, tripling its original size within seven months,[70] and being able to answer "roughly one-third" of the 100 billion monthly searches Google processed in May 2016.[71] The information is often used as a spoken answer in Google Assistant[72] and Google Home searches.[73] The Knowledge Graph has been criticized for providing answers without source attribution.[71]

Google Knowledge Panel

[edit]

A Google Knowledge Panel[74] is a feature integrated into Google search engine result pages, designed to present a structured overview of entities such as individuals, organizations, locations, or objects directly within the search interface. This feature leverages data from Google's Knowledge Graph,[75] a database that organizes and interconnects information about entities, enhancing the retrieval and presentation of relevant content to users.

The content within a Knowledge Panel[76] is derived from various sources, including Wikipedia and other structured databases, ensuring that the information displayed is both accurate and contextually relevant. For instance, querying a well-known public figure may trigger a Knowledge Panel displaying essential details such as biographical information, birthdate, and links to social media profiles or official websites.

The primary objective of the Google Knowledge Panel is to provide users with immediate, factual answers, reducing the need for extensive navigation across multiple web pages.

Personal tab

[edit]

In May 2017, Google enabled a new "Personal" tab in Google Search, letting users search for content in their Google accounts' various services, including email messages from Gmail and photos from Google Photos.[77][78]

Google Discover

[edit]

Google Discover, previously known as Google Feed, is a personalized stream of articles, videos, and other news-related content. The feed contains a "mix of cards" which show topics of interest based on users' interactions with Google, or topics they choose to follow directly.[79] Cards include, "links to news stories, YouTube videos, sports scores, recipes, and other content based on what [Google] determined you're most likely to be interested in at that particular moment."[79] Users can also tell Google they're not interested in certain topics to avoid seeing future updates.

Google Discover launched in December 2016[80] and received a major update in July 2017.[81] Another major update was released in September 2018, which renamed the app from Google Feed to Google Discover, updated the design, and adding more features.[82]

Discover can be found on a tab in the Google app and by swiping left on the home screen of certain Android devices. As of 2019, Google will not allow political campaigns worldwide to target their advertisement to people to make them vote.[83]

AI Overviews

[edit]

At the 2023 Google I/O event in May, Google unveiled Search Generative Experience (SGE), an experimental feature in Google Search available through Google Labs which produces AI-generated summaries in response to search prompts.[84] This was part of Google's wider efforts to counter the unprecedented rise of generative AI technology, ushered by OpenAI's launch of ChatGPT, which sent Google executives to a panic due to its potential threat to Google Search.[85] Google added the ability to generate images in October.[86] At I/O in 2024, the feature was upgraded and renamed AI Overviews.[87]

"cheese not sticking to pizza"
Early AI Overview response to the problem of "cheese not sticking to pizza"

AI Overviews was rolled out to users in the United States in May 2024.[87] The feature faced public criticism in the first weeks of its rollout after errors from the tool went viral online. These included results suggesting users add glue to pizza or eat rocks,[88] or incorrectly claiming Barack Obama is Muslim.[89] Google described these viral errors as "isolated examples", maintaining that most AI Overviews provide accurate information.[88][90] Two weeks after the rollout of AI Overviews, Google made technical changes and scaled back the feature, pausing its use for some health-related queries and limiting its reliance on social media posts.[91] Scientific American has criticised the system on environmental grounds, as such a search uses 30 times more energy than a conventional one.[92] It has also been criticized for condensing information from various sources, making it less likely for people to view full articles and websites. When it was announced in May 2024, Danielle Coffey, CEO of the News/Media Alliance was quoted as saying "This will be catastrophic to our traffic, as marketed by Google to further satisfy user queries, leaving even less incentive to click through so that we can monetize our content."[93]

In August 2024, AI Overviews were rolled out in the UK, India, Japan, Indonesia, Mexico and Brazil, with local language support.[94] On October 28, 2024, AI Overviews was rolled out to 100 more countries, including Australia and New Zealand.[95]

Redesigns

[edit]
Product Sans, Google's typeface since 2015

In late June 2011, Google introduced a new look to the Google homepage in order to boost the use of the Google+ social tools.[96]

One of the major changes was replacing the classic navigation bar with a black one. Google's digital creative director Chris Wiggins explains: "We're working on a project to bring you a new and improved Google experience, and over the next few months, you'll continue to see more updates to our look and feel."[97] The new navigation bar has been negatively received by a vocal minority.[98]

In November 2013, Google started testing yellow labels for advertisements displayed in search results, to improve user experience. The new labels, highlighted in yellow color, and aligned to the left of each sponsored link help users differentiate between organic and sponsored results.[99]

On December 15, 2016, Google rolled out a new desktop search interface that mimics their modular mobile user interface. The mobile design consists of a tabular design that highlights search features in boxes. and works by imitating the desktop Knowledge Graph real estate, which appears in the right-hand rail of the search engine result page, these featured elements frequently feature Twitter carousels, People Also Search For, and Top Stories (vertical and horizontal design) modules. The Local Pack and Answer Box were two of the original features of the Google SERP that were primarily showcased in this manner, but this new layout creates a previously unseen level of design consistency for Google results.[100]

Smartphone apps

[edit]

Google offers a "Google Search" mobile app for Android and iOS devices.[101] The mobile apps exclusively feature Google Discover and a "Collections" feature, in which the user can save for later perusal any type of search result like images, bookmarks or map locations into groups.[102] Android devices were introduced to a preview of the feed, perceived as related to Google Now, in December 2016,[103] while it was made official on both Android and iOS in July 2017.[104][105]

In April 2016, Google updated its Search app on Android to feature "Trends"; search queries gaining popularity appeared in the autocomplete box along with normal query autocompletion.[106] The update received significant backlash, due to encouraging search queries unrelated to users' interests or intentions, prompting the company to issue an update with an opt-out option.[107] In September 2017, the Google Search app on iOS was updated to feature the same functionality.[108]

In December 2017, Google released "Google Go", an app designed to enable use of Google Search on physically smaller and lower-spec devices in multiple languages. A Google blog post about designing "India-first" products and features explains that it is "tailor-made for the millions of people in [India and Indonesia] coming online for the first time".[109]

[edit]
A definition link is provided for many search terms.

Google Search consists of a series of localized websites. The largest of those, the google.com site, is the top most-visited website in the world.[110] Some of its features include a definition link for most searches including dictionary words, the number of results you got on your search, links to other searches (e.g. for words that Google believes to be misspelled, it provides a link to the search results using its proposed spelling), the ability to filter results to a date range,[111] and many more.

Search syntax

[edit]

Google search accepts queries as normal text, as well as individual keywords.[112] It automatically corrects apparent misspellings by default (while offering to use the original spelling as a selectable alternative), and provides the same results regardless of capitalization.[112] For more customized results, one can use a wide variety of operators, including, but not limited to:[113][114]

  • OR or | – Search for webpages containing one of two similar queries, such as marathon OR race
  • AND – Search for webpages containing two similar queries, such as marathon AND runner
  • - (minus sign) – Exclude a word or a phrase, so that "apple -tree" searches where word "tree" is not used
  • "" – Force inclusion of a word or a phrase, such as "tallest building"
  • * – Placeholder symbol allowing for any substitute words in the context of the query, such as "largest * in the world"
  • .. – Search within a range of numbers, such as "camera $50..$100"
  • site: – Search within a specific website, such as "site:youtube.com"
  • define: – Search for definitions for a word or phrase, such as "define:phrase"
  • stocks: – See the stock price of investments, such as "stocks:googl"
  • related: – Find web pages related to specific URL addresses, such as "related:www.wikipedia.org"
  • cache: – Highlights the search-words within the cached pages, so that "cache:www.google.com xxx" shows cached content with word "xxx" highlighted.
  • ( ) – Group operators and searches, such as (marathon OR race) AND shoes
  • filetype: or ext: – Search for specific file types, such as filetype:gif
  • before: – Search for before a specific date, such as spacex before:2020-08-11
  • after: – Search for after a specific date, such as iphone after:2007-06-29
  • @ – Search for a specific word on social media networks, such as "@twitter"

Google also offers a Google Advanced Search page with a web interface to access the advanced features without needing to remember the special operators.[115]

Query expansion

[edit]

Google applies query expansion to submitted search queries, using techniques to deliver results that it considers "smarter" than the query users actually submitted. This technique involves several steps, including:[116]

  • Word stemming – Certain words can be reduced so other, similar terms, are also found in results, so that "translator" can also search for "translation"
  • Acronyms – Searching for abbreviations can also return results about the name in its full length, so that "NATO" can show results for "North Atlantic Treaty Organization"
  • Misspellings – Google will often suggest correct spellings for misspelled words
  • Synonyms – In most cases where a word is incorrectly used in a phrase or sentence, Google search will show results based on the correct synonym
  • Translations – The search engine can, in some instances, suggest results for specific words in a different language
  • Ignoring words – In some search queries containing extraneous or insignificant words, Google search will simply drop those specific words from the query
A screenshot of suggestions by Google Search when "wikip" is typed

In 2008, Google started to give users autocompleted search suggestions in a list below the search bar while typing, originally with the approximate result count previewed for each listed search suggestion.[117]

"I'm Feeling Lucky"

[edit]

Google's homepage includes a button labeled "I'm Feeling Lucky". This feature originally allowed users to type in their search query, click the button and be taken directly to the first result, bypassing the search results page. Clicking it while leaving the search box empty opens Google's archive of Doodles.[118] With the 2010 announcement of Google Instant, an automatic feature that immediately displays relevant results as users are typing in their query, the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button disappears, requiring that users opt-out of Instant results through search settings to keep using the "I'm Feeling Lucky" functionality.[119] In 2012, "I'm Feeling Lucky" was changed to serve as an advertisement for Google services; users hover their computer mouse over the button, it spins and shows an emotion ("I'm Feeling Puzzled" or "I'm Feeling Trendy", for instance), and, when clicked, takes users to a Google service related to that emotion.[120]

Tom Chavez of "Rapt", a firm helping to determine a website's advertising worth, estimated in 2007 that Google lost $110 million in revenue per year due to use of the button, which bypasses the advertisements found on the search results page.[121]

Special interactive features

[edit]

Besides the main text-based search-engine function of Google search, it also offers multiple quick, interactive features. These include, but are not limited to:[122][123][124]

  • Calculator
  • Time zone, currency, and unit conversions
  • Word translations
  • Flight status
  • Local film showings
  • Weather forecasts
  • Population and unemployment rates
  • Package tracking
  • Word definitions
  • Metronome
  • Roll a die
  • "Do a barrel roll" (search page spins)
  • "Askew" (results show up sideways)
[edit]

During Google's developer conference, Google I/O, in May 2013, the company announced that users on Google Chrome and ChromeOS would be able to have the browser initiate an audio-based search by saying "OK Google", with no button presses required. After having the answer presented, users can follow up with additional, contextual questions; an example include initially asking "OK Google, will it be sunny in Santa Cruz this weekend?", hearing a spoken answer, and reply with "how far is it from here?"[125][126] An update to the Chrome browser with voice-search functionality rolled out a week later, though it required a button press on a microphone icon rather than "OK Google" voice activation.[127] Google released a browser extension for the Chrome browser, named with a "beta" tag for unfinished development, shortly thereafter.[128] In May 2014, the company officially added "OK Google" into the browser itself;[129] they removed it in October 2015, citing low usage, though the microphone icon for activation remained available.[130] In May 2016, 20% of search queries on mobile devices were done through voice.[131]

Operations

[edit]

Search products

[edit]
Google Videos
Screenshot
Google Videos homepage as of 2016
Type of site
Video search engine
Available in Multilingual
Owner Google
URL www.google.com/videohp
Commercial Yes
Registration Recommended
Launched August 20, 2012; 12 years ago (2012-08-20)

In addition to its tool for searching web pages, Google also provides services for searching images, Usenet newsgroups, news websites, videos (Google Videos), searching by locality, maps, and items for sale online. Google Videos allows searching the World Wide Web for video clips.[132] The service evolved from Google Video, Google's discontinued video hosting service that also allowed to search the web for video clips.[132]

In 2012, Google has indexed over 30 trillion web pages, and received 100 billion queries per month.[133] It also caches much of the content that it indexes. Google operates other tools and services including Google News, Google Shopping, Google Maps, Google Custom Search, Google Earth, Google Docs, Picasa (discontinued), Panoramio (discontinued), YouTube, Google Translate, Google Blog Search and Google Desktop Search (discontinued[134]).

There are also products available from Google that are not directly search-related. Gmail, for example, is a webmail application, but still includes search features; Google Browser Sync does not offer any search facilities, although it aims to organize your browsing time.

Energy consumption

[edit]

In 2009, Google claimed that a search query requires altogether about 1 kJ or 0.0003 kW·h,[135] which is enough to raise the temperature of one liter of water by 0.24 °C. According to green search engine Ecosia, the industry standard for search engines is estimated to be about 0.2 grams of CO2 emission per search.[136] Google's 40,000 searches per second translate to 8 kg CO2 per second or over 252 million kilos of CO2 per year.[137]

Google Doodles

[edit]

On certain occasions, the logo on Google's webpage will change to a special version, known as a "Google Doodle". This is a picture, drawing, animation, or interactive game that includes the logo. It is usually done for a special event or day although not all of them are well known.[138] Clicking on the Doodle links to a string of Google search results about the topic. The first was a reference to the Burning Man Festival in 1998,[139][140] and others have been produced for the birthdays of notable people like Albert Einstein, historical events like the interlocking Lego block's 50th anniversary and holidays like Valentine's Day.[141] Some Google Doodles have interactivity beyond a simple search, such as the famous "Google Pac-Man" version that appeared on May 21, 2010.

Criticism

[edit]

Privacy

[edit]

Google has been criticized for placing long-term cookies on users' machines to store preferences, a tactic which also enables them to track a user's search terms and retain the data for more than a year.[142]

Since 2012, Google Inc. has globally introduced encrypted connections for most of its clients, to bypass governative blockings of the commercial and IT services.[143]

Complaints about indexing

[edit]

In 2003, The New York Times complained about Google's indexing, claiming that Google's caching of content on its site infringed its copyright for the content.[144] In both Field v. Google and Parker v. Google, the United States District Court of Nevada ruled in favor of Google.[145][146]

Child sexual abuse

[edit]

A 2019 New York Times article on Google Search showed that images of child sexual abuse had been found on Google and that the company had been reluctant at times to remove them.[147]

January 2009 malware bug

[edit]
A screenshot of the error of January 31, 2009

Google flags search results with the message "This site may harm your computer" if the site is known to install malicious software in the background or otherwise surreptitiously. For approximately 40 minutes on January 31, 2009, all search results were mistakenly classified as malware and could therefore not be clicked; instead a warning message was displayed and the user was required to enter the requested URL manually. The bug was caused by human error.[148][149][150][151] The URL of "/" (which expands to all URLs) was mistakenly added to the malware patterns file.[149][150]

Possible misuse of search results

[edit]

In 2007, a group of researchers observed a tendency for users to rely exclusively on Google Search for finding information, writing that "With the Google interface the user gets the impression that the search results imply a kind of totality. ... In fact, one only sees a small part of what one could see if one also integrates other research tools."[152]

In 2011, Google Search query results have been shown by Internet activist Eli Pariser to be tailored to users, effectively isolating users in what he defined as a filter bubble. Pariser holds algorithms used in search engines such as Google Search responsible for catering "a personal ecosystem of information".[153] Although contrasting views have mitigated the potential threat of "informational dystopia" and questioned the scientific nature of Pariser's claims,[154] filter bubbles have been mentioned to account for the surprising results of the U.S. presidential election in 2016 alongside fake news and echo chambers, suggesting that Facebook and Google have designed personalized online realities in which "we only see and hear what we like".[155]

FTC fines

[edit]

In 2012, the US Federal Trade Commission fined Google US$22.5 million for violating their agreement not to violate the privacy of users of Apple's Safari web browser.[156] The FTC was also continuing to investigate if Google's favoring of their own services in their search results violated antitrust regulations.[157]

Payments to Apple

[edit]

In a November 2023 disclosure, during the ongoing antitrust trial against Google, an economics professor at the University of Chicago revealed that Google pays Apple 36% of all search advertising revenue generated when users access Google through the Safari browser. This revelation reportedly caused Google's lead attorney to cringe visibly.[citation needed] The revenue generated from Safari users has been kept confidential, but the 36% figure suggests that it is likely in the tens of billions of dollars.

Both Apple and Google have argued that disclosing the specific terms of their search default agreement would harm their competitive positions. However, the court ruled that the information was relevant to the antitrust case and ordered its disclosure. This revelation has raised concerns about the dominance of Google in the search engine market and the potential anticompetitive effects of its agreements with Apple.[158]

Big data and human bias

[edit]

Google search engine robots are programmed to use algorithms that understand and predict human behavior. The book, Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code[159] by Ruha Benjamin talks about human bias as a behavior that the Google search engine can recognize. In 2016, some users Google searched "three Black teenagers" and images of criminal mugshots of young African American teenagers came up. Then, the users searched "three White teenagers" and were presented with photos of smiling, happy teenagers. They also searched for "three Asian teenagers", and very revealing photos of Asian girls and women appeared. Benjamin concluded that these results reflect human prejudice and views on different ethnic groups. A group of analysts explained the concept of a racist computer program: "The idea here is that computers, unlike people, can't be racist but we're increasingly learning that they do in fact take after their makers ... Some experts believe that this problem might stem from the hidden biases in the massive piles of data that the algorithms process as they learn to recognize patterns ... reproducing our worst values".[159]

Monopoly ruling

[edit]

On August 5, 2024, Google lost a lawsuit which started in 2020 in D.C. Circuit Court, with Judge Amit Mehta finding that the company had an illegal monopoly over Internet search.[160] This monopoly was held to be in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act.[161] Google has said it will appeal the ruling[162], though they did propose to loosen search deals with Apple and others requiring them to set Google as the default search engine.[163]

Trademark

[edit]

As people talk about "googling" rather than searching, the company has taken some steps to defend its trademark, in an effort to prevent it from becoming a generic trademark.[164][165] This has led to lawsuits, threats of lawsuits, and the use of euphemisms, such as calling Google Search a famous web search engine.[166]

Discontinued features

[edit]

Translate foreign pages

[edit]

Until May 2013, Google Search had offered a feature to translate search queries into other languages. A Google spokesperson told Search Engine Land that "Removing features is always tough, but we do think very hard about each decision and its implications for our users. Unfortunately, this feature never saw much pick up".[167]

[edit]

Instant search was announced in September 2010 as a feature that displayed suggested results while the user typed in their search query, initially only in select countries or to registered users.[168] The primary advantage of the new system was its ability to save time, with Marissa Mayer, then-vice president of search products and user experience, proclaiming that the feature would save 2–5 seconds per search, elaborating that "That may not seem like a lot at first, but it adds up. With Google Instant, we estimate that we'll save our users 11 hours with each passing second!"[169] Matt Van Wagner of Search Engine Land wrote that "Personally, I kind of like Google Instant and I think it represents a natural evolution in the way search works", and also praised Google's efforts in public relations, writing that "With just a press conference and a few well-placed interviews, Google has parlayed this relatively minor speed improvement into an attention-grabbing front-page news story".[170] The upgrade also became notable for the company switching Google Search's underlying technology from HTML to AJAX.[171]

Instant Search could be disabled via Google's "preferences" menu for those who didn't want its functionality.[172]

The publication 2600: The Hacker Quarterly compiled a list of words that Google Instant did not show suggested results for, with a Google spokesperson giving the following statement to Mashable:[173]

There are several reasons you may not be seeing search queries for a particular topic. Among other things, we apply a narrow set of removal policies for pornography, violence, and hate speech. It's important to note that removing queries from Autocomplete is a hard problem, and not as simple as blacklisting particular terms and phrases.

In search, we get more than one billion searches each day. Because of this, we take an algorithmic approach to removals, and just like our search algorithms, these are imperfect. We will continue to work to improve our approach to removals in Autocomplete, and are listening carefully to feedback from our users.

Our algorithms look not only at specific words, but compound queries based on those words, and across all languages. So, for example, if there's a bad word in Russian, we may remove a compound word including the transliteration of the Russian word into English. We also look at the search results themselves for given queries. So, for example, if the results for a particular query seem pornographic, our algorithms may remove that query from Autocomplete, even if the query itself wouldn't otherwise violate our policies. This system is neither perfect nor instantaneous, and we will continue to work to make it better.

PC Magazine discussed the inconsistency in how some forms of the same topic are allowed; for instance, "lesbian" was blocked, while "gay" was not, and "cocaine" was blocked, while "crack" and "heroin" were not. The report further stated that seemingly normal words were also blocked due to pornographic innuendos, most notably "scat", likely due to having two completely separate contextual meanings, one for music and one for a sexual practice.[174]

On July 26, 2017, Google removed Instant results, due to a growing number of searches on mobile devices, where interaction with search, as well as screen sizes, differ significantly from a computer.[175][176]

 

Instant previews[edit]

"Instant previews" allowed previewing screenshots of search results' web pages without having to open them. The feature was introduced in November 2010 to the desktop website and removed in April 2013 citing low usage.[177][178]

Dedicated encrypted search page

[edit]

Various search engines provide encrypted Web search facilities. In May 2010 Google rolled out SSL-encrypted web search.[179] The encrypted search was accessed at encrypted.google.com[180] However, the web search is encrypted via Transport Layer Security (TLS) by default today, thus every search request should be automatically encrypted if TLS is supported by the web browser.[181] On its support website, Google announced that the address encrypted.google.com would be turned off April 30, 2018, stating that all Google products and most new browsers use HTTPS connections as the reason for the discontinuation.[182]

[edit]

Google Real-Time Search was a feature of Google Search in which search results also sometimes included real-time information from sources such as Twitter, Facebook, blogs, and news websites.[183] The feature was introduced on December 7, 2009,[184] and went offline on July 2, 2011, after the deal with Twitter expired.[185] Real-Time Search included Facebook status updates beginning on February 24, 2010.[186] A feature similar to Real-Time Search was already available on Microsoft's Bing search engine, which showed results from Twitter and Facebook.[187] The interface for the engine showed a live, descending "river" of posts in the main region (which could be paused or resumed), while a bar chart metric of the frequency of posts containing a certain search term or hashtag was located on the right hand corner of the page above a list of most frequently reposted posts and outgoing links. Hashtag search links were also supported, as were "promoted" tweets hosted by Twitter (located persistently on top of the river) and thumbnails of retweeted image or video links.

In January 2011, geolocation links of posts were made available alongside results in Real-Time Search. In addition, posts containing syndicated or attached shortened links were made searchable by the link: query option. In July 2011, Real-Time Search became inaccessible, with the Real-Time link in the Google sidebar disappearing and a custom 404 error page generated by Google returned at its former URL. Google originally suggested that the interruption was temporary and related to the launch of Google+;[188] they subsequently announced that it was due to the expiry of a commercial arrangement with Twitter to provide access to tweets.[189]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ York, Dan (June 6, 2016). "Google's IPv6 Stats Hit 12% on Fourth Anniversary of World IPv6 Launch". CircleID. Archived from the original on November 28, 2020. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
  2. ^ "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine". Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Archived from the original on April 25, 2009. Retrieved January 27, 2009.
  3. ^ "Search Engine Market Share Worldwide | StatCounter Global Stats". StatCounter Global Stats. Archived from the original on December 10, 2020. Retrieved April 9, 2021.
  4. ^ "google.com". similarweb.com.
  5. ^ Fisher, Adam (July 10, 2018). "Brin, Page, and Mayer on the Accidental Birth of the Company that Changed Everything". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on July 4, 2019. Retrieved August 23, 2019.
  6. ^ McHugh, Josh (January 1, 2003). "Google vs. Evil". Wired. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  7. ^ D'Onfro, Jillian (February 13, 2016). "How a billionaire who wrote Google's original code created a robot revolution". Business Insider. Archived from the original on August 24, 2019. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  8. ^ Yoon, John; Isaac, Mike (August 10, 2024). "Susan Wojcicki, Former Chief of YouTube, Dies at 56". New York Times. Retrieved August 10, 2024.
  9. ^ Google (Tue June 14, 2011) Official announcement Archived July 31, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  10. ^ Hubbard, Douglas (2011). Pulse: The New Science of Harnessing Internet Buzz to Track Threats and Opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
  11. ^ "Soon We Won't Program Computers. We'll Train Them Like Dogs". Wired. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  12. ^ Barakat, Matthew; Liedtke, Michale (August 5, 2024). "Google illegally maintains monopoly over internet search, judge rules". Associated Press. Retrieved August 6, 2024.
  13. ^ "A court says Google is a monopolist. Now what?". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved November 18, 2024.
  14. ^ "A court says Google is a monopolist. Now what?". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved November 18, 2024.
  15. ^ a b Dominguez, Trace (September 2, 2015). "How Much of the Internet Is Hidden?". Seeker. Group Nine Media. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  16. ^ "View web pages cached in Google Search Results". Google Search Help. Archived from the original on December 18, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  17. ^ Boswell, Wendy (November 1, 2017). "How to Use Google to Find and Open Files Online". Lifewire. Dotdash. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  18. ^ "Block explicit results on Google using SafeSearch". Google Search Help. Archived from the original on April 6, 2018. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  19. ^ Rosen, JJ (May 3, 2014). "The Internet you can't Google". The Tennessean. Gannett Company. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  20. ^ Sherman, Chris; Price, Gary (May 22, 2008). "The Invisible Web: Uncovering Sources Search Engines Can't See". Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. hdl:2142/8528.
  21. ^ Albanesius, Chloe (August 10, 2012). "Google to Demote Sites With 'High Number' of Copyright Complaints". PC Magazine. Ziff Davis. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  22. ^ Schwartz, Barry (October 13, 2016). "Within months, Google to divide its index, giving mobile users better & fresher content". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on December 9, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  23. ^ Roberts, Hannah (October 27, 2016). "Google is splitting its search index to target 'stripped down' mobile websites". Business Insider. Axel Springer SE. Archived from the original on December 9, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  24. ^ Perez, Sarah (December 20, 2017). "Google's mobile-first search index has rolled out to a handful of sites". TechCrunch. Oath Inc. Archived from the original on December 20, 2017. Retrieved December 21, 2017.
  25. ^ Barnett, Emma (August 11, 2009). "Google reveals caffeine: a new faster search engine". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  26. ^ Fox, Vanessa (August 10, 2009). "Google Caffeine: Google's New Search Engine Index". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  27. ^ Fox, Vanessa (June 8, 2010). "Google's New Indexing Infrastructure "Caffeine" Now Live". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  28. ^ Metz, Cade (September 9, 2010). "Google search index splits with MapReduce". The Register. Situation Publishing. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  29. ^ Metz, Cade (August 14, 2009). "Google Caffeine: What it really is". The Register. Situation Publishing. Archived from the original on December 23, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  30. ^ Schwartz, Barry (August 9, 2018). "Google's Aug. 1 core algorithm update: Who did it impact, and how much". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on August 23, 2018. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
  31. ^ "Google Medic Update: Google's Core Search Update Had Big Impact On Health/Medical Sites". seroundtable.com. August 8, 2018. Archived from the original on March 21, 2019. Retrieved March 11, 2019.
  32. ^ "Google Search Statistics - Internet Live Stats". www.internetlivestats.com. Archived from the original on February 4, 2015. Retrieved April 9, 2021.
  33. ^ Barker, Alex; McCarthy, Bede (April 9, 2013). "Google favours 'in-house' search results". Financial Times. Archived from the original on December 10, 2022. Retrieved January 26, 2014.
  34. ^ D'Onfro, Jillian (April 19, 2015). "Google is making a giant change this week that could crush millions of small businesses". Business Insider. Archived from the original on October 7, 2016. Retrieved November 5, 2016.
  35. ^ Brin, S.; Page, L. (1998). "The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine" (PDF). Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. 30 (1–7): 107–117. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.115.5930. doi:10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X. ISSN 0169-7552. S2CID 7587743. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 8, 2006.
  36. ^ "Corporate Information: Technology Overview". Archived from the original on February 10, 2010. Retrieved November 15, 2009.
  37. ^ Levy, Steven (February 22, 2010). "Exclusive: How Google's Algorithm Rules the Web". Wired. Vol. 17, no. 12. Wired.com. Archived from the original on April 16, 2011.
  38. ^ "About: RankDex" Archived January 20, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, RankDex
  39. ^ "Method for node ranking in a linked database". Google Patents. Archived from the original on October 15, 2015. Retrieved October 19, 2015.
  40. ^ "Google's goal: to organize your daily life" Archived October 19, 2011, at the Wayback Machine. Financial Times.
  41. ^ "Google and the Search for the Future" Archived July 30, 2017, at the Wayback Machine. The Wall Street Journal.
  42. ^ "Google Webmaster Guidelines". Archived from the original on January 9, 2009. Retrieved November 15, 2009.
  43. ^ Segal, David (November 26, 2010). "A Bully Finds a Pulpit on the Web". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 2, 2022. Retrieved November 27, 2010.
  44. ^ "Blogspot.com". Googleblog.blogspot.com. Archived from the original on October 19, 2012. Retrieved August 4, 2012.
  45. ^ a b c Elran, Asher (November 15, 2013). "What Google 'Hummingbird' Means for Your SEO Strategy". Entrepreneur. Archived from the original on June 24, 2022. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  46. ^ Sullivan, Danny (September 26, 2013). "FAQ: All About The New Google "Hummingbird" Algorithm". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on December 23, 2018. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  47. ^ Dodds, Don (December 16, 2013). "An SEO Guide to the Google Hummingbird Update". HuffPost. Oath Inc. Archived from the original on June 4, 2016. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  48. ^ Taylor, Richard (September 26, 2013). "Google unveils major upgrade to search algorithm". BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on June 26, 2022. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  49. ^ Marentis, Chris (April 11, 2014). "A Complete Guide To The Essentials Of Post-Hummingbird SEO". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on June 28, 2022. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  50. ^ Warzel, Charlie (September 22, 2023). "The Tragedy of Google Search". The Atlantic. Retrieved November 7, 2023.
  51. ^ Megan Gray (October 2, 2023). "How Google Alters Search Queries to Get at Your Wallet". Archived from the original on October 2, 2023. This onscreen Google slide had to do with a "semantic matching" overhaul to its SERP algorithm. When you enter a query, you might expect a search engine to incorporate synonyms into the algorithm as well as text phrase pairings in natural language processing. But this overhaul went further, actually altering queries to generate more commercial results.
  52. ^ Megan Gray (October 8, 2023). "Google is controlling the trial w/ its secrecy designations, controlling our searches w/ its greed, and controlling Wired w/ its scare tactics. I wrote an op-ed re Google mucking around w/ organic search to make it more shopping-oriented to gin up ad $. I stand by that. My 🧵". Twitter. Archived from the original on November 7, 2023 – via Thread Reader App.
  53. ^ Schwartz, Barry (March 5, 2024). "Google releasing massive search quality enhancements in March 2024 core update and multiple spam updates". Search Engine Land.
  54. ^ Schwartz, Barry (March 20, 2024). "Google March 2024 spam update done rolling out". Search Engine Land.
  55. ^ a b Hancock, Edith (September 10, 2024). "Google loses EU court battle over €2.4B antitrust fine". Politico. Retrieved September 10, 2024.
  56. ^ "test". Google Search. Archived from the original on October 5, 2021. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
  57. ^ Slegg, Jennifer (November 2, 2015). "Google Testing Huge 7-Line Snippets in Search Results". The SEM Post. Archived from the original on October 17, 2021. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
  58. ^ "Google officially increases length of snippets in search results". Search Engine Land. December 1, 2017. Archived from the original on October 5, 2021. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
  59. ^ Marshall, Matt (May 16, 2007). "Google's move to "universal search"". VentureBeat. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  60. ^ Sullivan, Danny (May 16, 2007). "Google Launches "Universal Search" & Blended Results". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  61. ^ Mayer, Marissa (May 16, 2007). "Universal search: The best answer is still the best answer". Official Google Blog. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  62. ^ Lardinois, Frederic (June 20, 2017). "Google launches its AI-powered jobs search engine". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on June 21, 2017. Retrieved June 22, 2017.
  63. ^ Gebhart, Andrew (June 20, 2017). "Google for Jobs is ready to help your employment search". CNET. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on June 20, 2017. Retrieved June 22, 2017.
  64. ^ Fox, Vanessa (May 12, 2009). "Google Search Now Supports Microformats and Adds "Rich Snippets" to Search Results". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on December 9, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  65. ^ Schwartz, Barry (May 17, 2016). "Google launches rich cards for movie and recipe websites". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on December 9, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  66. ^ Schwartz, Barry (March 29, 2017). "Google quietly expands rich cards worldwide". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on December 9, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  67. ^ a b Singhal, Amit (May 16, 2012). "Introducing the Knowledge Graph: things, not strings". Official Google Blog. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  68. ^ "Your business information in the Knowledge Panel". Google My Business Help. Archived from the original on April 20, 2017. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  69. ^ Newton, Casey (December 14, 2012). "How Google is taking the Knowledge Graph global". CNET. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  70. ^ Newton, Casey (December 4, 2012). "Google's Knowledge Graph tripled in size in seven months". CNET. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on August 29, 2018. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  71. ^ a b Dewey, Caitlin (May 11, 2016). "You probably haven't even noticed Google's sketchy quest to control the world's knowledge". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 25, 2017. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  72. ^ Lynley, Matthew (May 18, 2016). "Google unveils Google Assistant, a virtual assistant that's a big upgrade to Google Now". TechCrunch. Oath Inc. Archived from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  73. ^ Bohn, Dieter (May 18, 2016). "Google Home: a speaker to finally take on the Amazon Echo". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on December 15, 2017. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  74. ^ Browne, Ryan (December 10, 2020). "Google launches knowledge panels in search results to tackle misinformation about Covid vaccines". CNBC. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
  75. ^ Lardinois, Frederic (May 16, 2012). "Google Just Got A Whole Lot Smarter, Launches Its Knowledge Graph". TechCrunch. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
  76. ^ Duffy, Scott (April 7, 2023). "How to Claim and Optimize Your Google Knowledge Panel". Entrepreneur. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
  77. ^ Gartenberg, Chaim (May 26, 2017). "Google adds new Personal tab to search results to show Gmail and Photos content". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on May 26, 2017. Retrieved May 27, 2017.
  78. ^ Westenberg, Jimmy (May 28, 2017). "New Personal tab in Google Search will show results from Photos, Gmail, and more". Android Authority. Archived from the original on December 15, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  79. ^ a b Bell, Karissa. "Google is using your entire search history to create a personalized news feed". Mashable. Archived from the original on May 23, 2018. Retrieved May 22, 2018.
  80. ^ "Google is putting a news feed in Android's home screen". The Verge. Archived from the original on September 13, 2018. Retrieved May 22, 2018.
  81. ^ Larson, Selena. "The Google app feed is about to get more personal". CNNMoney. Archived from the original on May 23, 2018. Retrieved May 22, 2018.
  82. ^ "Introducing Google Discover". The Keyword Google. Archived from the original on July 16, 2021. Retrieved July 14, 2021.
  83. ^ Lee, Dave (November 21, 2019). "Google to restrict political adverts worldwide". Archived from the original on November 21, 2019. Retrieved November 21, 2019.
  84. ^ Pierce, David (May 10, 2023). "The AI takeover of Google Search starts now". The Verge. Archived from the original on May 10, 2023. Retrieved September 12, 2023.
  85. ^ Levy, Steven (September 11, 2023). "Sundar Pichai on Google;s AI, Microsoft's AI, OpenAI, and ... Did We Mention AI?". Wired. Archived from the original on September 11, 2023. Retrieved September 12, 2023.
  86. ^ Peters, Jay (October 12, 2023). "Google's AI-powered search experience can now generate images". The Verge. Archived from the original on October 12, 2023. Retrieved October 15, 2023.
  87. ^ a b Pierce, David (May 14, 2024). "Google is redesigning its search engine — and it's AI all the way down". The Verge. Archived from the original on May 14, 2024. Retrieved May 14, 2024.
  88. ^ a b McMahon, Liv; Kleinman, Zoe (May 25, 2024). "Glue pizza and eat rocks: Google AI search errors go viral". BBC.
  89. ^ Field, Hayden (May 24, 2024). "Google criticized as AI Overview makes obvious errors, such as saying former President Obama is Muslim". CNBC.
  90. ^ Grant, Nico (May 24, 2024). "Google's A.I. Search Errors Cause a Furor Online". New York Times.
  91. ^ De Vynck, Gerrit (May 30, 2024). "Google scales back AI search answers after it told users to eat glue". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 31, 2024. Retrieved May 31, 2024.
  92. ^ Parshall, Allison. "What Do Google's AI Answers Cost the Environment?". Scientific American.
  93. ^ Darcy, Oliver (May 15, 2024). "News publishers sound alarm on Google's new AI-infused search, warn of 'catastrophic' impacts | CNN Business". CNN. Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  94. ^ Mauran, Cecily (August 15, 2024). "The new Google AI Overview layout is a small win for publishers". Mashable. Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  95. ^ Yeo, Amanda (October 28, 2024). "Google's AI Overview is rolling out worldwide". Mashable. Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  96. ^ Beato, Augusto. "Google Redesign Backs Social Effort". Portland SEO. Archived from the original on December 1, 2017. Retrieved July 1, 2011.
  97. ^ "Google redesigns its homepage". Los Angeles Times. June 29, 2011. Archived from the original on January 21, 2013. Retrieved August 4, 2012.
  98. ^ "Google support forum, one of many threads on being unable to switch off the black navigation bar". Archived from the original on December 24, 2011. Retrieved August 4, 2012.
  99. ^ "Google ads: The wolf is out of the lamb's skin". www.techmw.com. Archived from the original on December 2, 2013. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  100. ^ Schwartz, Barry (December 6, 2016). "Google begins rolling out a new desktop search user interface". Search Engine Land. blogspot. Archived from the original on December 7, 2016. Retrieved December 6, 2016.
  101. ^ "Google Search". Archived from the original on May 28, 2010. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  102. ^ Perez, Sarah (January 22, 2020). "Google's Collections feature now pushes people to save recipes & products, using AI". TechCrunch. Oath Inc. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved July 14, 2021.
  103. ^ Bohn, Dieter (December 6, 2016). "Google is putting a news feed in Android's home screen". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  104. ^ Newton, Casey (July 19, 2017). "Google introduces the feed, a personalized stream of news on iOS and Android". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  105. ^ Matney, Lucas (July 19, 2017). "Google introduces the feed, a news stream of your evolving interests". TechCrunch. Oath Inc. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  106. ^ Schwartz, Barry (April 19, 2016). "Google Testing Trending In Search Auto-Complete". Search Engine Roundtable. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  107. ^ Schwartz, Barry (August 11, 2016). "You Can Now Opt Out Of Trending Searches In The Google Search App". Search Engine Roundtable. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  108. ^ Perez, Sarah (September 1, 2017). "Google's Search app on iOS gets a Twitter-like Trends feature, faster Instant Answers". TechCrunch. Oath Inc. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  109. ^ "Google for India: Building India-first products and features". Google. December 5, 2017. Archived from the original on February 5, 2022. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  110. ^ "Top 500". Alexa Internet. Archived from the original on February 3, 2021. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  111. ^ Perry, Alex (April 10, 2019). "Google makes it way easier to search by date". Mashable. Archived from the original on March 2, 2022. Retrieved March 2, 2022.
  112. ^ a b "How to search on Google". Google Search Help. Archived from the original on December 5, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  113. ^ "Refine web searches". Google Search Help. Archived from the original on October 11, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  114. ^ Boswell, Wendy (October 5, 2017). "Advanced Google Search Shortcuts". Lifewire. Dotdash. Archived from the original on January 7, 2018. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  115. ^ "Google Advanced Search". Google. Archived from the original on June 8, 2022. Retrieved June 9, 2022.
  116. ^ Smarty, Ann (October 31, 2008). "What is Google Query Expansion? Cases and Examples". Search Engine Journal. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  117. ^ Sullivan, Danny (August 25, 2008). "Google.com Finally Gets Google Suggest Feature". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  118. ^ "What Does The I'm Feeling Lucky Button On Google Search Do?". Fossbytes. April 12, 2016. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved March 2, 2022.
  119. ^ Karch, Marziah (November 25, 2017). "How to Use Google's "I'm Feeling Lucky" Button". Lifewire. Dotdash. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  120. ^ Paul, Ian (August 24, 2012). "Google Changes 'I'm Feeling Lucky' Button". PC World. International Data Group. Archived from the original on August 31, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  121. ^ Newman, Brendan (November 19, 2007). "Are you feeling lucky? Google is". Marketplace. American Public Media. Archived from the original on October 20, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  122. ^ Reporters, Telegraph (August 17, 2017). "15 fun Google Easter eggs". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  123. ^ Klosowski, Thorin (September 6, 2012). "20 Google Search Shortcuts to Hone Your Google-Fu". Lifehacker. Univision Communications. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  124. ^ Graziano, Dan (August 9, 2013). "How to get the most out of Google search". CNET. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  125. ^ Warman, Matt (May 16, 2013). "'OK Google' - 'conversational search' is coming soon". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  126. ^ Robertson, Adi (May 15, 2013). "Google adds button-free voice search in Chrome: just say 'OK Google'". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  127. ^ Lee, Jessica (May 23, 2013). "Google Talks Back: Conversational Search Available on New Version of Chrome". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  128. ^ Albanesius, Chloe (November 27, 2013). "'OK Google' Voice Search Lands on Chrome". PC Magazine. Ziff Davis. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  129. ^ Protalinski, Emil (May 20, 2014). "Chrome 35 launches with 'OK Google' voice search, more control over touch input, new APIs and JavaScript features". The Next Web. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  130. ^ Protalinski, Emil (October 16, 2015). "Google removes 'OK Google' voice search from Chrome". VentureBeat. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
  131. ^ Shahani, Aarti (May 18, 2016). "With New Products, Google Flexes Muscles To Competitors, Regulators". NPR. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  132. ^ a b Sullivan, Danny (August 5, 2010). "Let's Celebrate Google's Biggest Failures!". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on April 5, 2019. Retrieved April 5, 2019.
  133. ^ "Google: 100 Billion Searches Per Month, Search To Integrate Gmail, Launching Enhanced Search App For iOS". Searchengineland.com. August 8, 2012. Archived from the original on March 3, 2013. Retrieved February 18, 2013.
  134. ^ Alan Eustace (September 2, 2011). "A fall spring-clean". Archived from the original on September 7, 2011. Retrieved October 1, 2020.
  135. ^ Blogspot.com Archived July 29, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, Powering a Google search
  136. ^ [1] Archived March 28, 2019, at the Wayback Machine How does Ecosia neutralize a search's CO2 emissions?
  137. ^ [2] Archived February 4, 2015, at the Wayback Machine Google Search Statistics
  138. ^ About Google Doodles . Google.com. Retrieved on November 29, 2013.
  139. ^ Hwang, Dennis (June 8, 2004). "Oodles of Doodles". Google (corporate blog). Archived from the original on December 2, 2010. Retrieved July 19, 2006.
  140. ^ "History of Doodles". Google, Inc. Archived from the original on February 5, 2014. Retrieved October 5, 2010.
  141. ^ "valentine07". Google. February 14, 2007. Archived from the original on March 7, 2007. Retrieved April 6, 2007.
  142. ^ Caddy, Becca (March 20, 2017). "Google tracks everything you do: here's how to delete it". Wired. Archived from the original on March 24, 2017. Retrieved March 20, 2017.
  143. ^ Craig Timberg; JIa Lynn Yang (March 12, 2014). "Google is encrypting search globally. That's bad for the NSA and China's censors". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 3, 2018. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  144. ^ Olsen, Stefanie (July 9, 2003). "Google cache raises copyright concerns". CNET. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on May 10, 2011. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  145. ^ Field v. Google, CV-S-04-0413-RCJ-LRL (Nevada District Court January 19, 2006), archived from the original.
  146. ^ Parker v. Google, 04-CV-3918 (Eastern Pennsylvania District Court March 10, 2006), archived from the original on 2006-05-19.
  147. ^ Keller, Michael H.; Dance, Gabriel J. X. (November 9, 2019). "Child Abusers Run Rampant as Tech Companies Look the Other Way". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 9, 2023.
  148. ^ Krebs, Brian (January 31, 2009). "Google: This Internet May Harm Your Computer". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 30, 2011. Retrieved January 31, 2009.
  149. ^ a b Mayer, Marissa (January 31, 2009). "This site may harm your computer on every search result?!?!". Official Google Blog. Archived from the original on February 2, 2009. Retrieved January 31, 2009.
  150. ^ a b Weinstein, Maxim (January 31, 2009). "Google glitch causes confusion". StopBadware. Archived from the original on July 8, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2010.
  151. ^ Cooper, Russ (January 31, 2009). "Serious problems with Google search". Verizon Business Security Blog. Archived from the original on July 17, 2011. Retrieved May 10, 2010.
  152. ^ Maurer, H.; Balke, Tilo; Kappe, Frank; Kulathuramaiyer, Narayanan; Weber, Stefan; Zaka, Bilal (September 30, 2007). "Report on dangers and opportunities posed by large search engines, particularly Google" (PDF). Graz University of Technology. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 29, 2009. Retrieved June 13, 2017.
  153. ^ Parramore, Lynn (October 10, 2010). "The Filter Bubble". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 22, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2011. Since Dec. 4, 2009, Google has been personalized for everyone. So when I had two friends this spring Google 'BP,' one of them got a set of links that was about investment opportunities in BP. The other one got information about the oil spill
  154. ^ Weisberg, Jacob (June 10, 2011). "Bubble Trouble: Is Web personalization turning us into solipsistic twits?". Slate. Archived from the original on June 12, 2011. Retrieved August 15, 2011.
  155. ^ Mostafa M. El-Bermawy (November 18, 2016). "Your Filter Bubble is Destroying Democracy". Wired. Retrieved March 3, 2017. The global village that was once the internet ... digital islands of isolation that are drifting further apart each day ... your experience online grows increasingly personalized
  156. ^ "Google fined over Safari privacy violation" Archived August 11, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Al Jazeera, August 10, 2012.
  157. ^ Bailey, Brandon. "Google's review by FTC nearing critical point" Archived January 22, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Mercury News, November 9, 2012.
  158. ^ Nylen, Leah (November 13, 2023). "Apple Gets 36% of Google Revenue in Search Deal, Expert Says". Bloomberg News. Retrieved November 14, 2023.
  159. ^ a b Benjamin, Ruha (2019). Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. pp. 94–95. ISBN 9781509526437.
  160. ^ Peters, Jay (August 6, 2024). "Now that Google is a monopolist, what's next? / Reaching a decision on what to do about Google Search could take a very long time". The Verge. Retrieved August 6, 2024.
  161. ^ Mallin, Alexander (August 5, 2024). "Google violated antitrust laws to maintain dominance over online search, judge says". ABC News. Retrieved August 6, 2024.
  162. ^ Milmo, Dan; editor, Dan Milmo Global technology (November 21, 2024). "Google must sell Chrome to end search monopoly, says US justice department". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved January 7, 2025. cite news: |last2= has generic name (help)
  163. ^ Godoy, Jody; Godoy, Jody (December 23, 2024). "Google offers to loosen search deals in US antitrust case remedy". Reuters. Retrieved January 7, 2025.
  164. ^ Duffy, Jonathan (June 20, 2003). "Google calls in the 'language police'". BBC News. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved April 10, 2019.
  165. ^ Ash, Karen Artz; Danow, Bret J. ""Google It": The Search Engine's Trademark May Be a Verb, But It's Not Generic". The National Law Review. Archived from the original on April 10, 2019. Retrieved April 10, 2019.
  166. ^ "Feedback: Weight in dollars squared". New Scientist. June 5, 2013. Archived from the original on April 26, 2021. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  167. ^ Schwartz, Barry (May 20, 2013). "Google Drops "Translated Foreign Pages" Search Option Due To Lack Of Use". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on October 17, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  168. ^ "Google Instant Search: The Complete User's Guide". Search Engine Land. September 8, 2010. Archived from the original on October 20, 2021. Retrieved October 5, 2021. Google Instant only works for searchers in the US or who are logged in to a Google account in selected countries outside the US
  169. ^ Mayer, Marissa (September 8, 2010). "Search: now faster than the speed of type". Official Google Blog. Archived from the original on December 15, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  170. ^ Wagner, Matt Van (September 20, 2010). "How Google Saved $100 Million By Launching Google Instant". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on October 19, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  171. ^ Gomes, Ben (September 9, 2010). "Google Instant, behind the scenes". Official Google Blog. Archived from the original on December 15, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  172. ^ Pash, Adam (September 8, 2010). "How to Turn Off Google Instant Search". Lifehacker. Univision Communications. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  173. ^ Axon, Samuel (September 28, 2010). "Which Words Does Google Instant Blacklist?". Mashable. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on December 15, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  174. ^ Horn, Leslie (September 29, 2010). "Google Instant Blacklist: Which Words Are Blocked?". PC Magazine. Ziff Davis. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  175. ^ Schwartz, Barry (July 26, 2017). "Google has dropped Google Instant Search". Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on December 15, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  176. ^ Statt, Nick (July 26, 2017). "Google will stop showing search results as you type because it makes no sense on mobile". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on December 15, 2017. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
  177. ^ Singel, Ryan (November 9, 2010). "Google Gives Searchers 'Instant Previews' of Result Pages". Wired. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
  178. ^ "Google Drops Instant Previews Over Low Usage". seroundtable.com. April 25, 2013. Archived from the original on October 5, 2021. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
  179. ^ "SSL Search: Features – Web Search Help". Web Search Help. May 2010. Archived from the original on May 24, 2010. Retrieved July 7, 2010.
  180. ^ "Encrypted.google.com". Archived from the original on December 29, 2013. Retrieved August 4, 2012.
  181. ^ "Google Will Start Encrypting Your Searches". Time. March 13, 2014. Retrieved February 6, 2017.
  182. ^ "Encrypted.google.com is going away". Google Inc. Archived from the original on March 27, 2018. Retrieved May 18, 2018.
  183. ^ "Google launches Real-Time Search" Archived January 26, 2021, at the Wayback Machine. Mashable. Retrieved July 12, 2010.
  184. ^ "Relevance meets the real-time web" Archived April 7, 2019, at the Wayback Machine. Google. Retrieved July 12, 2010.
  185. ^ "As Deal With Twitter Expires, Google Realtime Search Goes Offline". Searchengineland.com. July 4, 2011. Archived from the original on November 11, 2013. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  186. ^ "Google Real-Time Search Now Includes A Fraction Of Facebook Status Updates" Archived October 31, 2019, at the Wayback Machine. TechCrunch. Retrieved July 12, 2010.
  187. ^ "Google's Real-Time Search Ready to Challenge Bing" Archived July 6, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. PC World. Retrieved July 12, 2010.
  188. ^ Quotes delayed at least 15 min (December 31, 1999). "Business news: Financial, stock & investing news online - MSN Money". Money.msn.com. Archived from the original on April 2, 2011. Retrieved March 3, 2014.cite web: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  189. ^ "Google Realtime Search Goes Missing". Searchengineland.com. July 3, 2011. Archived from the original on February 14, 2014. Retrieved March 3, 2014.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]

 

 

The home page of the English Wikipedia (in 2023) is displayed in a web browser. The small house-shaped button in the upper left is for the browser's start page.

A home page (or homepage) is the main web page of a website.[1] Usually, the home page is located at the root of the website's domain or subdomain. For example, if the domain is example.com, the home page is likely located at the URL www.example.com/.

The term may also refer to the start page shown in a web browser when the application first opens.[2]

Function

[edit]

A home page is the main web page that a visitor will view when they navigate to a website via a search engine, and it may also function as a landing page to attract visitors.[3] In some cases, the home page is a site directory, particularly when a website has multiple home pages.

Good home page design is usually a high priority for a website;[4] for example, a news website may curate headlines and first paragraphs of top stories, with links to full articles.[5][6] According to Homepage Usability, the home page is the "most important page on any website" and receives the most views of any page.[7] A poorly designed home page can overwhelm and deter visitors from the site.[6] One important use of home pages is communicating the identity and value of a company.[8]

Browser start page

[edit]

When a web browser is launched, it will automatically open at least one web page. This is the browser's start page, which is also called its home page.[2][9]

Start pages can be a website or a special browser page, such as thumbnails of frequently visited websites. Moreover, there is a niche market of websites intended to be used solely as start pages.[9]

See also

[edit]
  • Contact page
  • Site map

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "What is a Home Page? – Definition from Techopedia". Techopedia.com. Archived from the original on 5 September 2024. Retrieved 2022-08-10.
  2. ^ a b "Start page". TheFreeDictionary.com. Retrieved 2024-12-18.
  3. ^ Nielsen & Tahir 2002a, p. 7.
  4. ^ Nielsen, Jakob (12 May 2002b). "Top 10 Guidelines for Homepage Usability". nngroup.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2016. Retrieved 4 September 2014.
  5. ^ Kalbach 2007, p. 106.
  6. ^ a b Nielsen & Tahir 2002a, p. 3.
  7. ^ Nielsen & Tahir 2002a, p. 1.
  8. ^ Nielsen & Tahir 2002a, p. 2.
  9. ^ a b Schofield, Jack (7 November 2013). "iGoogle: what are the best alternatives?". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 September 2014.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Campbell, Jennifer (2014). Web Design: Introductory. Cengage Learning. p. 76. ISBN 978-1-305-17627-0.
  • Kalbach, James (2007). Designing Web Navigation. O'Reilly Media. p. 106. ISBN 978-0-596-55378-4.
  • Nielsen, Jakob; Tahir, Marie (2002a). Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. [Indianapolis, IN]: New Riders. ISBN 0-7357-1102-X. OCLC 48657258.

 

 

An annotated example of a domain name

In the Internet, a domain name is a string that identifies a realm of administrative autonomy, authority or control. Domain names are often used to identify services provided through the Internet, such as websites, email services and more. Domain names are used in various networking contexts and for application-specific naming and addressing purposes. In general, a domain name identifies a network domain or an Internet Protocol (IP) resource, such as a personal computer used to access the Internet, or a server computer.

Domain names are formed by the rules and procedures of the Domain Name System (DNS). Any name registered in the DNS is a domain name. Domain names are organized in subordinate levels (subdomains) of the DNS root domain, which is nameless. The first-level set of domain names are the top-level domains (TLDs), including the generic top-level domains (gTLDs), such as the prominent domains com, info, net, edu, and org, and the country code top-level domains (ccTLDs). Below these top-level domains in the DNS hierarchy are the second-level and third-level domain names that are typically open for reservation by end-users who wish to connect local area networks to the Internet, create other publicly accessible Internet resources or run websites, such as "wikipedia.org". The registration of a second- or third-level domain name is usually administered by a domain name registrar who sell its services to the public.

A fully qualified domain name (FQDN) is a domain name that is completely specified with all labels in the hierarchy of the DNS, having no parts omitted. Traditionally a FQDN ends in a dot (.) to denote the top of the DNS tree.[1] Labels in the Domain Name System are case-insensitive, and may therefore be written in any desired capitalization method, but most commonly domain names are written in lowercase in technical contexts.[2] A hostname is a domain name that has at least one associated IP address.

Purpose

[edit]

Domain names serve to identify Internet resources, such as computers, networks, and services, with a text-based label that is easier to memorize than the numerical addresses used in the Internet protocols. A domain name may represent entire collections of such resources or individual instances. Individual Internet host computers use domain names as host identifiers, also called hostnames. The term hostname is also used for the leaf labels in the domain name system, usually without further subordinate domain name space. Hostnames appear as a component in Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) for Internet resources such as websites (e.g., en.wikipedia.org).

Domain names are also used as simple identification labels to indicate ownership or control of a resource. Such examples are the realm identifiers used in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), the Domain Keys used to verify DNS domains in e-mail systems, and in many other Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs).

An important function of domain names is to provide easily recognizable and memorizable names to numerically addressed Internet resources. This abstraction allows any resource to be moved to a different physical location in the address topology of the network, globally or locally in an intranet. Such a move usually requires changing the IP address of a resource and the corresponding translation of this IP address to and from its domain name.

Domain names are used to establish a unique identity. Organizations can choose a domain name that corresponds to their name, helping Internet users to reach them easily.

A generic domain is a name that defines a general category, rather than a specific or personal instance, for example, the name of an industry, rather than a company name. Some examples of generic names are books.com, music.com, and travel.info. Companies have created brands based on generic names, and such generic domain names may be valuable.[3]

Domain names are often simply referred to as domains and domain name registrants are frequently referred to as domain owners, although domain name registration with a registrar does not confer any legal ownership of the domain name, only an exclusive right of use for a particular duration of time. The use of domain names in commerce may subject them to trademark law.

History

[edit]

The practice of using a simple memorable abstraction of a host's numerical address on a computer network dates back to the ARPANET era, before the advent of today's commercial Internet. In the early network, each computer on the network retrieved the hosts file (host.txt) from a computer at SRI (now SRI International),[4][5] which mapped computer hostnames to numerical addresses. The rapid growth of the network made it impossible to maintain a centrally organized hostname registry and in 1983 the Domain Name System was introduced on the ARPANET and published by the Internet Engineering Task Force as RFC 882 and RFC 883.

The following table shows the first five .com domains with the dates of their registration:[6]

 
Domain name Registration date
symbolics.com 15 March 1985
bbn.com 24 April 1985
think.com 24 May 1985
mcc.com 11 July 1985
dec.com 30 September 1985

and the first five .edu domains:[7]

 
Domain name Registration date
berkeley.edu 24 April 1985
cmu.edu 24 April 1985
purdue.edu 24 April 1985
rice.edu 24 April 1985
ucla.edu 24 April 1985

Domain name space

[edit]
The hierarchical domain name system, organized into zones, each served by domain name servers

Today, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) manages the top-level development and architecture of the Internet domain name space. It authorizes domain name registrars, through which domain names may be registered and reassigned.

The hierarchy of labels in a fully qualified domain name

The domain name space consists of a tree of domain names. Each node in the tree holds information associated with the domain name. The tree sub-divides into zones beginning at the DNS root zone.

Domain name syntax

[edit]

A domain name consists of one or more parts, technically called labels, that are conventionally concatenated, and delimited by dots, such as example.com.

  • The right-most label conveys the top-level domain; for example, the domain name www.example.com belongs to the top-level domain com.
  • The hierarchy of domains descends from the right to the left label in the name; each label to the left specifies a subdivision, or subdomain of the domain to the right. For example: the label example specifies a node example.com as a subdomain of the com domain, and www is a label to create www.example.com, a subdomain of example.com. Each label may contain from 1 to 63 octets. The empty label is reserved for the root node and when fully qualified is expressed as the empty label terminated by a dot. The full domain name may not exceed a total length of 253 ASCII characters in its textual representation.[8]
  • A hostname is a domain name that has at least one associated IP address. For example, the domain names www.example.com and example.com are also hostnames, whereas the com domain is not. However, other top-level domains, particularly country code top-level domains, may indeed have an IP address, and if so, they are also hostnames.
  • Hostnames impose restrictions on the characters allowed in the corresponding domain name. A valid hostname is also a valid domain name, but a valid domain name may not necessarily be valid as a hostname.

Top-level domains

[edit]

When the Domain Name System was devised in the 1980s, the domain name space was divided into two main groups of domains.[9] The country code top-level domains (ccTLD) were primarily based on the two-character territory codes of ISO-3166 country abbreviations. In addition, a group of seven generic top-level domains (gTLD) was implemented which represented a set of categories of names and multi-organizations.[10] These were the domains gov, edu, com, mil, org, net, and int. These two types of top-level domains (TLDs) are the highest level of domain names of the Internet. Top-level domains form the DNS root zone of the hierarchical Domain Name System. Every domain name ends with a top-level domain label.

During the growth of the Internet, it became desirable to create additional generic top-level domains. As of October 2009, 21 generic top-level domains and 250 two-letter country-code top-level domains existed.[11] In addition, the ARPA domain serves technical purposes in the infrastructure of the Domain Name System.

During the 32nd International Public ICANN Meeting in Paris in 2008,[12] ICANN started a new process of TLD naming policy to take a "significant step forward on the introduction of new generic top-level domains." This program envisions the availability of many new or already proposed domains, as well as a new application and implementation process.[13] Observers believed that the new rules could result in hundreds of new top-level domains to be registered.[14] In 2012, the program commenced, and received 1930 applications.[15] By 2016, the milestone of 1000 live gTLD was reached.

The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) maintains an annotated list of top-level domains in the DNS root zone database.[16]

For special purposes, such as network testing, documentation, and other applications, IANA also reserves a set of special-use domain names.[17] This list contains domain names such as example, local, localhost, and test. Other top-level domain names containing trade marks are registered for corporate use. Cases include brands such as BMW, Google, and Canon.[18]

Second-level and lower level domains

[edit]

Below the top-level domains in the domain name hierarchy are the second-level domain (SLD) names. These are the names directly to the left of .com, .net, and the other top-level domains. As an example, in the domain example.co.uk, co is the second-level domain.

Next are third-level domains, which are written immediately to the left of a second-level domain. There can be fourth- and fifth-level domains, and so on, with virtually no limitation. Each label is separated by a full stop (dot). An example of an operational domain name with four levels of domain labels is sos.state.oh.us. 'sos' is said to be a sub-domain of 'state.oh.us', and 'state' a sub-domain of 'oh.us', etc. In general, subdomains are domains subordinate to their parent domain. An example of very deep levels of subdomain ordering are the IPv6 reverse resolution DNS zones, e.g., 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa, which is the reverse DNS resolution domain name for the IP address of a loopback interface, or the localhost name.

Second-level (or lower-level, depending on the established parent hierarchy) domain names are often created based on the name of a company (e.g., bbc.co.uk), product or service (e.g. hotmail.com). Below these levels, the next domain name component has been used to designate a particular host server. Therefore, ftp.example.com might be an FTP server, www.example.com would be a World Wide Web server, and mail.example.com could be an email server, each intended to perform only the implied function. Modern technology allows multiple physical servers with either different (cf. load balancing) or even identical addresses (cf. anycast) to serve a single hostname or domain name, or multiple domain names to be served by a single computer. The latter is very popular in Web hosting service centers, where service providers host the websites of many organizations on just a few servers.

The hierarchical DNS labels or components of domain names are separated in a fully qualified name by the full stop (dot, .).

Internationalized domain names

[edit]

The character set allowed in the Domain Name System is based on ASCII and does not allow the representation of names and words of many languages in their native scripts or alphabets. ICANN approved the Internationalized domain name (IDNA) system, which maps Unicode strings used in application user interfaces into the valid DNS character set by an encoding called Punycode. For example, københavn.eu is mapped to xn--kbenhavn-54a.eu. Many registries have adopted IDNA.

Domain name registration

[edit]

History

[edit]

The first commercial Internet domain name, in the TLD com, was registered on 15 March 1985 in the name symbolics.com by Symbolics Inc., a computer systems firm in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

By 1992, fewer than 15,000 com domains had been registered.

In the first quarter of 2015, 294 million domain names had been registered.[19] A large fraction of them are in the com TLD, which as of December 21, 2014, had 115.6 million domain names,[20] including 11.9 million online business and e-commerce sites, 4.3 million entertainment sites, 3.1 million finance related sites, and 1.8 million sports sites.[21] As of July 15, 2012, the com TLD had more registrations than all of the ccTLDs combined.[22]

As of December 31, 2023, 359.8 million domain names had been registered.[23]

Administration

[edit]

The right to use a domain name is delegated by domain name registrars, which are accredited by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the organization charged with overseeing the name and number systems of the Internet. In addition to ICANN, each top-level domain (TLD) is maintained and serviced technically by an administrative organization operating a registry. A registry is responsible for maintaining the database of names registered within the TLD it administers. The registry receives registration information from each domain name registrar authorized to assign names in the corresponding TLD and publishes the information using a special service, the WHOIS protocol.

Registries and registrars usually charge an annual fee for the service of delegating a domain name to a user and providing a default set of name servers. Often, this transaction is termed a sale or lease of the domain name, and the registrant may sometimes be called an "owner", but no such legal relationship is actually associated with the transaction, only the exclusive right to use the domain name. More correctly, authorized users are known as "registrants" or as "domain holders".

ICANN publishes the complete list of TLD registries and domain name registrars. Registrant information associated with domain names is maintained in an online database accessible with the WHOIS protocol. For most of the 250 country code top-level domains (ccTLDs), the domain registries maintain the WHOIS (Registrant, name servers, expiration dates, etc.) information.

Some domain name registries, often called network information centers (NIC), also function as registrars to end-users. The major generic top-level domain registries, such as for the com, net, org, info domains and others, use a registry-registrar model consisting of hundreds of domain name registrars (see lists at ICANN[24] or VeriSign).[25] In this method of management, the registry only manages the domain name database and the relationship with the registrars. The registrants (users of a domain name) are customers of the registrar, in some cases through additional layers of resellers.

There are also a few other alternative DNS root providers that try to compete or complement ICANN's role of domain name administration, however, most of them failed to receive wide recognition, and thus domain names offered by those alternative roots cannot be used universally on most other internet-connecting machines without additional dedicated configurations.

Technical requirements and process

[edit]

In the process of registering a domain name and maintaining authority over the new name space created, registrars use several key pieces of information connected with a domain:

  • Administrative contact. A registrant usually designates an administrative contact to manage the domain name. The administrative contact usually has the highest level of control over a domain. Management functions delegated to the administrative contacts may include management of all business information, such as name of record, postal address, and contact information of the official registrant of the domain and the obligation to conform to the requirements of the domain registry in order to retain the right to use a domain name. Furthermore, the administrative contact installs additional contact information for technical and billing functions.
  • Technical contact. The technical contact manages the name servers of a domain name. The functions of a technical contact include assuring conformance of the configurations of the domain name with the requirements of the domain registry, maintaining the domain zone records, and providing continuous functionality of the name servers (that leads to the accessibility of the domain name).
  • Billing contact. The party responsible for receiving billing invoices from the domain name registrar and paying applicable fees.
  • Name servers. Most registrars provide two or more name servers as part of the registration service. However, a registrant may specify its own authoritative name servers to host a domain's resource records. The registrar's policies govern the number of servers and the type of server information required. Some providers require a hostname and the corresponding IP address or just the hostname, which must be resolvable either in the new domain, or exist elsewhere. Based on traditional requirements (RFC 1034), typically a minimum of two servers is required.

A domain name consists of one or more labels, each of which is formed from the set of ASCII letters, digits, and hyphens (a–z, A–Z, 0–9, -), but not starting or ending with a hyphen. The labels are case-insensitive; for example, 'label' is equivalent to 'Label' or 'LABEL'. In the textual representation of a domain name, the labels are separated by a full stop (period).

Business models

[edit]

Domain names are often seen in analogy to real estate in that domain names are foundations on which a website can be built, and the highest quality domain names, like sought-after real estate, tend to carry significant value, usually due to their online brand-building potential, use in advertising, search engine optimization, and many other criteria.

A few companies have offered low-cost, below-cost or even free domain registration with a variety of models adopted to recoup the costs to the provider. These usually require that domains be hosted on their website within a framework or portal that includes advertising wrapped around the domain holder's content, revenue from which allows the provider to recoup the costs. Domain registrations were free of charge when the DNS was new. A domain holder may provide an infinite number of subdomains in their domain. For example, the owner of example.org could provide subdomains such as foo.example.org and foo.bar.example.org to interested parties.

Many desirable domain names are already assigned and users must search for other acceptable names, using Web-based search features, or WHOIS and dig operating system tools. Many registrars have implemented domain name suggestion tools which search domain name databases and suggest available alternative domain names related to keywords provided by the user.

Resale of domain names

[edit]

The business of resale of registered domain names is known as the domain aftermarket. Various factors influence the perceived value or market value of a domain name. Most of the high-prize domain sales are carried out privately.[26] Also, it is called confidential domain acquiring or anonymous domain acquiring.[27]

Domain name confusion

[edit]

Intercapping is often used to emphasize the meaning of a domain name, because DNS names are not case-sensitive. Some names may be misinterpreted in certain uses of capitalization. For example: Who Represents, a database of artists and agents, chose whorepresents.com,[28] which can be misread. In such situations, the proper meaning may be clarified by placement of hyphens when registering a domain name. For instance, Experts Exchange, a programmers' discussion site, used expertsexchange.com, but changed its domain name to experts-exchange.com.[29]

Uses in website hosting

[edit]

The domain name is a component of a uniform resource locator (URL) used to access websites, for example:

  • URL: http://www.example.net/index.html
  • Top-level domain: net
  • Second-level domain: example
  • Hostname: www

A domain name may point to multiple IP addresses to provide server redundancy for the services offered, a feature that is used to manage the traffic of large, popular websites.

Web hosting services, on the other hand, run servers that are typically assigned only one or a few addresses while serving websites for many domains, a technique referred to as virtual web hosting. Such IP address overloading requires that each request identifies the domain name being referenced, for instance by using the HTTP request header field Host:, or Server Name Indication.

Abuse and regulation

[edit]

Critics often claim abuse of administrative power over domain names. Particularly noteworthy was the VeriSign Site Finder system which redirected all unregistered .com and .net domains to a VeriSign webpage. For example, at a public meeting with VeriSign to air technical concerns about Site Finder,[30] numerous people, active in the IETF and other technical bodies, explained how they were surprised by VeriSign's changing the fundamental behavior of a major component of Internet infrastructure, not having obtained the customary consensus. Site Finder, at first, assumed every Internet query was for a website, and it monetized queries for incorrect domain names, taking the user to VeriSign's search site. Other applications, such as many implementations of email, treat a lack of response to a domain name query as an indication that the domain does not exist, and that the message can be treated as undeliverable. The original VeriSign implementation broke this assumption for mail, because it would always resolve an erroneous domain name to that of Site Finder. While VeriSign later changed Site Finder's behaviour with regard to email, there was still widespread protest about VeriSign's action being more in its financial interest than in the interest of the Internet infrastructure component for which VeriSign was the steward.

Despite widespread criticism, VeriSign only reluctantly removed it after the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) threatened to revoke its contract to administer the root name servers. ICANN published the extensive set of letters exchanged, committee reports, and ICANN decisions.[31]

There is also significant disquiet regarding the United States Government's political influence over ICANN. This was a significant issue in the attempt to create a .xxx top-level domain and sparked greater interest in alternative DNS roots that would be beyond the control of any single country.[32]

Additionally, there are numerous accusations of domain name front running, whereby registrars, when given whois queries, automatically register the domain name for themselves. Network Solutions has been accused of this.[33]

Truth in Domain Names Act

[edit]

In the United States, the Truth in Domain Names Act of 2003, in combination with the PROTECT Act of 2003, forbids the use of a misleading domain name with the intention of attracting Internet users into visiting Internet pornography sites.

The Truth in Domain Names Act follows the more general Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act passed in 1999 aimed at preventing typosquatting and deceptive use of names and trademarks in domain names.

Seizures

[edit]

In the early 21st century, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) pursued the seizure of domain names, based on the legal theory that domain names constitute property used to engage in criminal activity, and thus are subject to forfeiture. For example, in the seizure of the domain name of a gambling website, the DOJ referenced 18 U.S.C. § 981 and 18 U.S.C. § 1955(d).[34][1] In 2013 the US government seized Liberty Reserve, citing 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1).[35]

The U.S. Congress passed the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act in 2010. Consumer Electronics Association vice president Michael Petricone was worried that seizure was a blunt instrument that could harm legitimate businesses.[36][37] After a joint operation on February 15, 2011, the DOJ and the Department of Homeland Security claimed to have seized ten domains of websites involved in advertising and distributing child pornography, but also mistakenly seized the domain name of a large DNS provider, temporarily replacing 84,000 websites with seizure notices.[38]

In the United Kingdom, the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU) has been attempting to seize domain names from registrars without court orders.[39]

Suspensions

[edit]

PIPCU and other UK law enforcement organisations make domain suspension requests to Nominet which they process on the basis of breach of terms and conditions. Around 16,000 domains are suspended annually, and about 80% of the requests originate from PIPCU.[40]

Property rights

[edit]

Because of the economic value it represents, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that the exclusive right to a domain name is protected as property under article 1 of Protocol 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights.[41]

IDN variants

[edit]

ICANN Business Constituency (BC) has spent decades trying to make IDN variants work at the second level, and in the last several years at the top level. Domain name variants are domain names recognized in different character encodings, like a single domain presented in traditional Chinese and simplified Chinese. It is an Internationalization and localization problem. Under Domain Name Variants, the different encodings of the domain name (in simplified and traditional Chinese) would resolve to the same host.[42][43]

According to John Levine, an expert on Internet related topics, "Unfortunately, variants don't work. The problem isn't putting them in the DNS, it's that once they're in the DNS, they don't work anywhere else."[42]

Fictitious domain name

[edit]

A fictitious domain name is a domain name used in a work of fiction or popular culture to refer to a domain that does not actually exist, often with invalid or unofficial top-level domains such as ".web", a usage exactly analogous to the dummy 555 telephone number prefix used in film and other media. The canonical fictitious domain name is "example.com", specifically set aside by IANA in RFC 2606 for such use, along with the .example TLD.

Domain names used in works of fiction have often been registered in the DNS, either by their creators or by cybersquatters attempting to profit from it. This phenomenon prompted NBC to purchase the domain name Hornymanatee.com after talk-show host Conan O'Brien spoke the name while ad-libbing on his show. O'Brien subsequently created a website based on the concept and used it as a running gag on the show.[44] Companies whose works have used fictitious domain names have also employed firms such as MarkMonitor to park fictional domain names in order to prevent misuse by third parties.[45]

Misspelled domain names

[edit]

Misspelled domain names, also known as typosquatting or URL hijacking, are domain names that are intentionally or unintentionally misspelled versions of popular or well-known domain names. The goal of misspelled domain names is to capitalize on internet users who accidentally type in a misspelled domain name, and are then redirected to a different website.

Misspelled domain names are often used for malicious purposes, such as phishing scams or distributing malware. In some cases, the owners of misspelled domain names may also attempt to sell the domain names to the owners of the legitimate domain names, or to individuals or organizations who are interested in capitalizing on the traffic generated by internet users who accidentally type in the misspelled domain names.

To avoid being caught by a misspelled domain name, internet users should be careful to type in domain names correctly, and should avoid clicking on links that appear suspicious or unfamiliar. Additionally, individuals and organizations who own popular or well-known domain names should consider registering common misspellings of their domain names in order to prevent others from using them for malicious purposes.

Domain name spoofing

[edit]

The term Domain name spoofing (or simply though less accurately, Domain spoofing) is used generically to describe one or more of a class of phishing attacks that depend on falsifying or misrepresenting an internet domain name.[46][47] These are designed to persuade unsuspecting users into visiting a web site other than that intended, or opening an email that is not in reality from the address shown (or apparently shown).[48] Although website and email spoofing attacks are more widely known, any service that relies on domain name resolution may be compromised.

Types

[edit]

There are a number of better-known types of domain spoofing:

The typosquatter's URL will usually be one of five kinds, all similar to the victim site address:
  • A common misspelling, or foreign language spelling, of the intended site
  • A misspelling based on a typographical error
  • A plural of a singular domain name
  • A different top-level domain: (i.e. .com instead of .org)
  • An abuse of the Country Code Top-Level Domain (ccTLD) (.cm, .co, or .om instead of .com)
  • IDN homograph attack. This type of attack depends on registering a domain name that is similar to the 'target' domain, differing from it only because its spelling includes one or more characters that come from a different alphabet but look the same to the naked eye. For example, the Cyrillic, Latin, and Greek alphabets each have their own letter A, each of which has its own binary code point. Turkish has a dotless letter i (ı) that may not be perceived as different from the ASCII letter i. Most web browsers warn of 'mixed alphabet' domain names,[50][51][52][53] Other services, such as email applications, may not provide the same protection. Reputable top level domain and country code domain registrars will not accept applications to register a deceptive name but this policy cannot be presumed to be infallible.
  • DNS spoofing – Cyberattack using corrupt DNS data
  • Website spoofing – Creating a website, as a hoax, with the intention of misleading readers
  • Email spoofing – Creating email spam or phishing messages with a forged sender identity or address

Risk mitigation

[edit]

Legitimate technologies that may be subverted

[edit]
  • URL redirection – Technique for making a Web page available under more than one URL address
  • Domain fronting – Technique for Internet censorship circumvention

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Stevens, W. Richard (1994). TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1: The Protocols. Vol. 1 (1 ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 9780201633467.
  2. ^ Arends, R.; Austein, R.; Larson, M.; Massey, D.; Rose, S. (2005). RFC 4034 – Resource Records for the DNS Security Extensions (Technical report). IEFT. doi:10.17487/RFC4034. Archived from the original on 2018-09-20. Retrieved 2015-07-05.
  3. ^ Low, Jerry. "Why are generic domains so expensive?". TheRealJerryLow.com. Archived from the original on 20 March 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2018.
  4. ^ RFC 3467, Role of the Domain Name System (DNS), J.C. Klensin, J. Klensin (February 2003)
  5. ^ Cricket Liu, Paul Albitz (2006). DNS and BIND (5th ed.). O'Reilly. p. 3. Archived from the original on 2011-09-05. Retrieved 2011-10-22.
  6. ^ "The first ever 20 domain names registered". ComputerWeekly.com. Archived from the original on 2020-08-08. Retrieved 2020-07-30.
  7. ^ Rooksby, Jacob H. (2015). "Defining Domain: Higher Education's Battles for Cyberspace". Brooklyn Law Review. 80 (3): 857–942. Archived from the original on 2018-11-07. Retrieved 2015-10-27. at p. 869
  8. ^ Mockapetris, P. (November 1987). "Domain names - Implementation and specification (RFC 1035)". IETF Datatracker. Retrieved January 21, 2024.
  9. ^ "Introduction to Top-Level Domains (gTLDs)". Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). Archived from the original on 2009-06-15. Retrieved 2009-06-26.
  10. ^ RFC 920, Domain Requirements, J. Postel, J. Reynolds, The Internet Society (October 1984)
  11. ^ "New gTLD Program" Archived 2011-11-25 at the Wayback Machine, ICANN, October 2009
  12. ^ "32nd International Public ICANN Meeting". ICANN. 2008-06-22. Archived from the original on 2009-03-08. Retrieved 2009-06-26.
  13. ^ "New gTLS Program". ICANN. Archived from the original on 2011-09-10. Retrieved 2009-06-15.
  14. ^ ICANN Board Approves Sweeping Overhaul of Top-level Domains Archived 2009-06-26 at the Wayback Machine, CircleID, 26 June 2008.
  15. ^ "About the Program - ICANN New gTLDs". ICANN. Archived from the original on 2016-11-03. Retrieved 2016-11-09.
  16. ^ "Root Zone Database". IANA. Archived from the original on 2019-05-04. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  17. ^ Cheshire, S.; Krochmal, M. (February 2013). "RFC6761 - Special-Use Domain Names". Internet Engineering Task Force. doi:10.17487/RFC6761. Archived from the original on 13 November 2020. Retrieved 3 May 2015.
  18. ^ "Executive Summary - dot brand observatory". observatory.domains. Archived from the original on 2016-11-10. Retrieved 2016-11-09.
  19. ^ Internet Grows to 294 Million Domain Names in the First Quarter of 2015 Archived 2017-12-20 at the Wayback Machine, Jun 30, 2015.
  20. ^ "Thirty years of .COM domains - and the numbers are up". Geekzone. Mar 13, 2015. Archived from the original on April 7, 2016. Retrieved Mar 25, 2016.
  21. ^ Evangelista, Benny. 2010. "25 years of .com names." San Francisco Chronicle. March 15, p. 1
  22. ^ "Domain domination: The com TLD larger than all ccTLDs combined". Royal.pingdom.com. Archived from the original on 2012-07-23. Retrieved 2012-07-25.
  23. ^ "DNIB Quarterly Report Q4 2023". Domain Name Industry Brief (DNIB). Retrieved 16 February 2024.
  24. ^ "ICANN-Accredited Registrars". ICANN. Archived from the original on 2019-05-19. Retrieved 2012-09-13.
  25. ^ "Choose A Top Domain Registrar Of Your Choice Using Our Search Tool". Verisign. Archived from the original on 2015-09-04. Retrieved 2015-08-10.
  26. ^ Arif, Sengoren (1 October 2024). "Confidentially domain acquiring".
  27. ^ "Anonymous Domain Ownership". Conference: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). 1 October 2024.
  28. ^ Courtney, Curzi (14 October 2014). "WhoRepresents helps brands connect with celebrity influencers". DM News. Archived from the original on 8 July 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  29. ^ Ki, Mae Heussner (2 June 2010). "'Slurls': Most Outrageous Website URLs". ABC News. Archived from the original on 31 May 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  30. ^ McCullagh, Declan (2003-10-03). "VeriSign fends off critics at ICANN confab". CNET News. Archived from the original on January 4, 2013. Retrieved 2007-09-22.
  31. ^ "Verisign's Wildcard Service Deployment". ICANN. Archived from the original on 2008-12-02. Retrieved 2007-09-22.
  32. ^ Mueller, M (March 2004). Ruling the Root. MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-63298-5.
  33. ^ Slashdot.org Archived 2010-02-17 at the Wayback Machine, NSI Registers Every Domain Checked
  34. ^ FBI / DOJ (15 April 2011). "Warning". Archived from the original on 2011-04-14. Retrieved 2011-04-15.
  35. ^ Dia, Miaz (4 February 2010). "website laten maken". Kmowebdiensten. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved 8 December 2016.
  36. ^ Gabriel, Jeffrey (18 June 2020). "Past Congressional Attempts to Combat Online Copyright Infringement". Saw. Archived from the original on 2020-06-20. Retrieved 2020-06-19.
  37. ^ Jerome, Sarah (6 April 2011). "Tech industry wary of domain name seizures". The Hill. Archived from the original on 2011-04-10. Retrieved 2011-04-15.
  38. ^ "U.S. Government Shuts Down 84,000 Websites, 'By Mistake'". Archived from the original on 2018-12-25. Retrieved 2012-12-16.
  39. ^ Jeftovic, Mark (8 October 2013). "Whatever Happened to "Due Process" ?". Archived from the original on 5 December 2014. Retrieved 27 November 2014.
  40. ^ Tackling online criminal activity Archived 2017-12-16 at the Wayback Machine, 1 November 2016 – 31 October 2017, Nominet
  41. ^ ECHR 18 September 2007, no. 25379/04, 21688/05, 21722/05, 21770/05, Paeffgen v Germany.
  42. ^ a b Levine, John R. (April 21, 2019). "Domain Name Variants Still Won't Work". Archived from the original on July 29, 2020. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  43. ^ "Comment on ICANN Recommendations for Managing IDN Variant Top-Level Domains" (PDF). ICANN. April 21, 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  44. ^ "So This Manatee Walks Into the Internet Archived 2017-01-23 at the Wayback Machine", The New York Times, December 12, 2006. Retrieved April 12, 2008.
  45. ^ Allemann, Andrew (2019-11-05). "Part of MarkMonitor sold to OpSec Security". Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News. Retrieved 2024-11-26.
  46. ^ "Canadian banks hit by two-year domain name spoofing scam". Finextra. 9 January 2020. Archived from the original on 6 November 2021. Retrieved 27 August 2021.
  47. ^ "Domain spoofing". Barracuda Networks. Archived from the original on 2021-11-04. Retrieved 2021-08-27.
  48. ^ Tara Seals (August 6, 2019). "Mass Spoofing Campaign Abuses Walmart Brand". threatpost. Archived from the original on November 6, 2021. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  49. ^ "Example Screenshots of Strider URL Tracer With Typo-Patrol". Microsoft Research. Archived from the original on 21 December 2008.
  50. ^ "Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) in Google Chrome". chromium.googlesource.com. Archived from the original on 2020-11-01. Retrieved 2020-08-26.
  51. ^ "Upcoming update with IDN homograph phishing fix - Blog". Opera Security. 2017-04-21. Archived from the original on 2020-08-08. Retrieved 2020-08-26.
  52. ^ "About Safari International Domain Name support". Archived from the original on 2014-06-17. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  53. ^ "IDN Display Algorithm". Mozilla. Archived from the original on 2016-01-31. Retrieved 2016-01-31.
[edit]

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Website developers in Sydney typically offer an array of services including custom web design, web development, eCommerce solutions, digital marketing strategies, SEO optimization, and mobile app development. They can also provide regular site maintenance and user experience testing.
The cost of hiring a website developer in Sydney can vary greatly depending on the complexity of the project. A simple website could cost around $2,000-$5,000 AUD while more complex sites will be considerably more expensive. Its best to get a quote directly from the web design company for accurate pricing.
The timeline for developing a new site depends on several factors including complexity of the design, number of pages, custom features required etc. Generally it could take anywhere between 4-12 weeks to build a functional and visually pleasing website. However, this timeline is flexible based on client needs and feedback.